Is there an identity index value in JavaScript?

In JavaScript, values of objects and arrays can be indexed like the following: objOrArray[index]. Is there an identity “index” value?

In other words:

Is there a value of x that makes the following always true?

let a = [1, 2, 3, 4];
/* Is this true? */ a[x] == a

let b = { a: 1, b: 2, c: 3 };
/* Is this true? */ b[x] == b

Definition of an identity element:


There is no such thing built-in, as there is rarely a need for it (and sometimes even a need against it).0 It is nevertheless possible to roll your own ‘identity’ key:

const self = Symbol('self');

Object.defineProperty(Object.prototype, self, {
    enumerable: false,
    get() { "use strict"; return this; }

This will work on all primitives (other that null and undefined) and most JavaScript objects: that is, other than proxies or those that bypass the usual prototype chain by means of e.g. Object.create(null). Any object later in the prototype chain will also be able to disable the functionality, e.g. by doing { [self]: void 0 }; all these caveats mean that x[self] === x is by no means a universal law. But this is probably the best you can do.

Modifying Object.prototype is usually considered a bad idea, but the above manages to avoid most of its badness: adding the property at a symbol key (and making it explicitly non-enumerable as well) prevents it from unexpectedly showing up in iterations and lookups that walk the prototype chain, helping ensure no code should be impacted that does not specifically look for this property.

0 Even if such a feature existed, it would not be a good solution for the asker’s original use case: a ‘cut to 50 characters or take the whole string if shorter’ operation can be expressed as s.description.substring(0, s.description.length > 50 ? 50 : void 0) (or in fact just s.description.substring(0, 50)). It wouldn’t be any easier to express even with such a feature: depending on the condition, you still need to invoke the substring method, not just look it up, but not invoke the ‘self’ non-method. And given that you need to append an ellipsis at the end in the former case, you would still have to perform the condition check outside the substring call, making any shorthand rather ineffective. All that said, tricks like described in this answer do find some real use.

Source: stackoverflow
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy, and Copyright Policy. Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted. The answers/resolutions are collected from stackoverflow, are licensed under cc by-sa 2.5 , cc by-sa 3.0 and cc by-sa 4.0 © No Copyrights, All Questions are retrived from public domain..